1-30-05 This is the results of a survey sent by the CIVIC in December 2004. The results were provided to a few persons as the survey showing community opinion is totally reverse of Joanne's personal opinion which was falsely presented as "the CIVIC position"
But Swanson issued the CIVIC's position as:
It is our opinion that the community would support an airport along the lines of what they approved in 1958. To comply with the condition limiting aircraft to propeller driven aircraft changes in Federal law would require that the airport obtain a state permit for a Restricted “Special Use” Private Airport. Under proper management and concern for its neighbors, it may be possible for the facility to be conditioned to operate as not to be a nuisance.
Supporting the Airport is in violation of the CIVIC Charter which requires her to follow the members' voted position.
I am an Agua Dulce property owner. This is my opinion regarding the Revocation/Modification hearing for the Agua Dulce Airport.
| Question | total | Yes | Percent | No | percent |
| Should Turbo-prop Jets or pure jets be allowed? | 195 | 9 | 4.62% | 186 | 95.38% |
| Should helicopters (other than emergency) be allowed? | 192 | 39 | 20.31% | 153 | 79.69% |
| Should night take off or landings be allowed? | 194 | 8 | 4.12% | 186 | 95.88% |
| Should runway lights be allowed? | 196 | 17 | 8.67% | 179 | 91.33% |
| Should training be allowed ? | 191 | 32 | 16.75% | 159 | 83.25% |
| Should Regional Planning revoke the Airpark Permit? | 183 | 104 | 56.83% | 79 | 43.17% |